Friday, August 30, 2019

An Analysis of Leadership Theory; Personal Leadership Definition; and Personal Progress as a Leader

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on An Analysis of Leadership Theory; Personal Leadership Definition; and Personal Progress as a Leader. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality An Analysis of Leadership Theory; Personal Leadership Definition; and Personal Progress as a Leader paper right on time.


Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in An Analysis of Leadership Theory; Personal Leadership Definition; and Personal Progress as a Leader, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your An Analysis of Leadership Theory; Personal Leadership Definition; and Personal Progress as a Leader paper at affordable prices !Running Header An Analysis of Leadership Theory; Personal Leadership


Definition; and Personal Progress as a Leader


An Analysis of Leadership Theory; Personal Leadership Definition;


and Personal Progress as a Leader


Cheap custom writing service can write essays on An Analysis of Leadership Theory; Personal Leadership Definition; and Personal Progress as a Leader


Maureen Gaffney


Emmanuel College


Abstract


The objective of this paper is to compare and contrast theories between


Kouzes and Posner, authors of Leadership Challenge, theorist Peter F.


Drucker, author of The Effective Executve, and theorist Stephen R. Covey,


author of The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. Also included in the


paper, are references to Douglas McGregor, author of The Human Side of


Enterprise and his Theories X & Y, and Robert H. Rosen, author of Leading


People. Finally, it is my goal to express my own views on leadership and


how I personally would like to be perceived as a leader.


For years, theorists have attempted to tap the human mind in order to find


out what makes people tick, what motivates and moves them to work hard. Are


ambition and drive innate traits which all humans share? Are most humans


inclined to work as hard for someone elses gain as they are for their own?


Why do some workers excel and some slack?


All of the theorists mentioned in this paper have made it their business to


research the human mind and spirit in order to pinpoint the real connection


that leaders must make with people in order to gain loyalty and the extra


mile.


As with Abraham Maslows Hierarchy of Needs, people need to realize certain


human needs sequentially in order to mature. The most important task of any


leader is to tap the minds of all their employees. They need to connect and


relate to the people working for them. The whats in it for me? attitude,


is an unspoken barrier that all leaders must break through. Employees are


compensated with paychecks, benefits, sometimes rewards, etc., but no one


individual is obligated to give any more than they can get away with in any


eight hour period. This is the average worker. In order to motivate workers


to work as if it were for their own personal gain is really the task at hand


for all leaders.


There are many different types of Leadership Theory Contingency Theory


(situational); responding differently to different people; Trait and


Behavioral Leadership, where the former assumes that leadership is innate


and the latter assumes leadership is learned. Peter F. Drucker believed that


effective leadership could be learned. Contemporary Leadership consists of


charisma and people who have the ability to transform others within an


organization. Participative Leadership is where a leader creates vision and


gives others direction while navigating along side them. Systematic


Leadership produces a ripple effect. If a leader wants to shift an


organization in a new direction, presumably, the system falls into place


naturally. For example, at one time people didnt eat lobster. One person


had to be the first to try it. Once it was established the lobster was a


delicacy, then everyone wanted to eat lobster. Attribution Leadership is


based on perceptions of attributes of followers.


Kouzes/Posner and Covey deal mainly in feelings and practices that foster


feelings. Its not that what they advise is not worthwhile, on the contrary,


their advice is very effective. However, their from the heart approach to


leadership is still a foreign concept to many men in business. Men and their


male egos have been an issue since the beginning of time, getting them to


change is quite an undertaking. McGregor and Drucker on the other hand are


from the old school what they tout is more technical and tangible. They


guide the leader on a path of instruction rather than behaviors. Although


Drucker and McGregor do advise on behavioral issues, such as motivation, but


this is so that they can influence an employee to be more productive, not


necessarily to encourage ones inner leader.


Although there was some resistance to loosening the hard-line management


approach, it became evident that losing the pretensious attitude produced


happier employess. When the touchy feely based management theory started to


become popular in the mid 100s, it was frowned upon by many corporate gray


suit types. They feared the practices would be too democratic and that they


would lose control.


Exemplary leaders recognize that such self-serving behavior is the path to


organizational suicide, and that successful leaders and team members


subordinate their own goals to the service of a greater good.


(Kouzes/Posner, (00), p. 51)


Knowledge work knows no gender; men and women do the same jobs. This, too,


is a major change in the human condition. (Drucker, (Spring 000), p.1)


In Druckers article Knowledge Means Managing Oneself he emphasizes the


importance of knowledge in that employees should be knowledgeably


well-rounded within the company. It is not good enough for employees to


segregate their knowledge to one aspect of the business. This means too that


it can only benefit the employee to be able to comprehend the process of the


finance department as well as human resources department.


Many managers would agree that the effectiveness of their organizations


would be at least doubled if they could discover how to tap the unrealized


potential present in their human resources. (McGregor (160), p.4)


McGregor says that although it is wise to tap into past experiences as


reference for management it is not enough. Every managerial act rests on


assumptions, generalizations and hypothesis - theory. p.6


Kouzes/Posner, authors of Leadership Challenge, have comprised the Five


Practices of Exemplary Leadership. The first is Model the Way, encouraging


leaders to find their voice, their passion and what drives them to excel.


By finding a clear and concise voice to lead with conveys a smooth line in


which to guide employees. Competetence, establishing values and setting


examples are also elements of modeling the way. The second, is Inspired


Shared Vision, which ?


Creating trust by building respect within a group. Its important to allow


yourself to trust in others and be open to their influence. If there is not


trust, there is no open line for which knowledge to flow. Kouzes/Posner


emphasizes interdependence by encouraging others to lead. The need to listen


is imperative as is practicing humility by making one self vulnerable. Like


with any relationship, if a wall is built around the heart for protection,


true love may not be able to penetrate and flourish. Being closed off from


anyone is detrimental to a persons growth.


Being open to others ideas is essential to creating the best situations for


a company. One person cannot be omnipotent, nor all knowing. Ego so often


gets in the way of greatness and such behavior has ruined companies as well


as entire nations. Unfortunately, I have seen the ego in overdrive in many


work environments. The upside to this otherwise tainted experience is that


I have observed and learned from the mistakes of those who let power go to


their head. This is not to say that by observing and learning I am now not


inclined to follow suit, but that I am not an egomaniac by nature, so it is


my hope that if given power I would not abuse it nor abuse those around me


due to a good moral fiber.


The Third Practice of Exemplary Leadership is Challenge the Process. This


practice encourages leaders to think outside the box and forge new paths to


success. By searching out opportunities, experimenting and taking risks.


Fourth is Enable Others to Act. Basically, this ties in with expanding the


creative process and letting others add to the mix through fostering


collaboration. Fifth and finally there is Encourage the Heart which is


where relationships and trust are formed and maintained. By recognizing


others talents and efforts with reward systems or celebrations. This is


what makes people feel less than like a number and more like a valued cog in


the corporate wheel.


Stephen R. Covey, author of The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People touts


the 7 Habits that foster success in people. In order to begin the 7 Habits,


Covey feels that one must first achieve the paradigm shift, which means to


change ones perception of the world. A paradigm is when one is conditioned


to see things one way, then comes the paradigm shift. In Coveys book, he


uses the example of a man and his rambunctious children getting on the


subway. The man is obviously exhausted and off in his own world of thought.


The passengers on the train are getting annoyed that the man is not paying


attention to his unruly children. One brave passenger decides to let this


man know that they dont appreciate his ignorance. When the passenger lets


the man know his thoughts, the exhausted man apologizes and informs him that


he and his children has just come from the hospital where his mother had


just passed. The moral of the story is that what this annoyed passenger


perceived as a rude situation was really quite excuseable and in turn took


the passenger from feelings of anger to that of compassion and sympathy. In


In order to achieve this shift, Covey outlines several exercises which aid


the individual.


It is imporant for leaders to shift paradigms frequently so that they do not


fall into a rut of one-way thinking and bias. Not only is this important


practice as it relates to business ideas and practices, but also with people


in general. Once the shift has occurred, then the Habits are introduced.


1. Be proactive. If I wasnt proactive with my education I would only sit


and wish that I could achieve my dreams, instead I make it happen. . Begin


with the End in Mind. A person must have goals and in order to have


direction. Its not that I need to have my entire life planned out in


detail, but it is important to envision outcomes as a way to keep oneself


motivated to stay the course. . Put First Things First. This is a slogan I


have used in my life for many years. To me, it means I need to take things


step by step and not overwhelm myself. If I spent my days projecting


situational outcomes I would be deluged with unfounded fear of the unknown.


4. Think Win/Win encompasses five dimensions. The first dimension is


character, of which is the foundation of his Win/Win theory. Integrity leads


the list followed by maturity. Covey puts into words what I believe all my


convictions are based on. The definition of emotional maturity - ˜The


ability to express ones own feelings and convictions balanced with


emotional consideration for the thoughts and feelings of otherss. This is


how I try to live my life, being kind hearted and thoughtful of others


feelings.5. Seek First to Understand, Then to Be Understood. This is obvious


in that it is essential in any relationship to listen in order to have that


action reciprocated which results in communication. 6. Synergize. The


essence of synergy is to value differences - to respect them, to build on


strengths, to compensate for weaknesses. (Covey, ( ), p. 6) 7.


Sharpen the Saw. This means to keep all of the other habits sharp and tuned.


If you are disciplined and then begin to slack, it will not be long before


you are no longer disciplined.


Covey also touts the Universal Resolutions in his article, Three


Resolutions. If you want to overcome the pull of the past those powerful


restraining forces of habit, custom and culture to bring about desired


change, count the costs and rally the necessary resources. (Covey, (16,


18), p. 1) The first has to do with appetites and passions. By overcoming


bad habits that lead to poor health one can be open mind, body and spirit to


higher energy and change. To do this one needs self-discipline a principle


which also relies on the principles of temperance and consistency. The


second has to do with overcoming the restraining forces of pride and


pretension. Living in harmony with your core values and principles (p.


) is a guaranteed way to keep from getting too large an ego. I


The essence of these Three Resolutions is so that the individual can be free


to transform and excel without the baggage of excess weighing them down.


Oddly enough, the Third Resolution is to overcome the restraining forces of


aspiration and ambition. Coveys reasoning is that if one person is too


self serving then the company will suffer. If people are looking out for


number one and whats in it for me, they will have no sense of


stewardship no sense of being an agent for worthy principles, purposes and


causes. They become a law unto themselves, a principal. (p. 4) Therefore,


Covey says that humility is the mother of all other virtues because it


promotes stewardship and once that is in place, all good things will come.


When leaders need subordinates to work for the better good of the company,


behavioral and motivational techniques are needed. The average human being


has an inherent dislike of work and will avoid it if he can. (McGregor,


(160), p. ) This is what McGregor refers to as Theory X, the traditional


view. It is his belief that this has been a common belief throughout time.


The average human being prefers to be directed, wishes to avoid


responsibility, has relatively little ambition, wants security above all.


(p.4)


To summarize, Theory Y states that working should be as natural a process as


recreational activities, but how do you tap into the natural desire to work?


Punishment is not the only way to entice people to produce and that


self-actualization, or satisfaction derived from producing good work, is a


motivating factor unto itself. Therefore, it is wise to stroke the ego with


praise.


The similarities among these theorists lie deep within the human heart. In


stark contrast of management and leadership styles prior to the second half


of the 1st Century, when it was common practice for superiors to lead with


an iron fist and instill fear in their subordinates in order to make them


comply, the new style is that of nurturing and generating compliance through


loyalty, self-esteem and empowerment. These theorists share a common thread


that centers in the heart. They recommend a nurturing approach to management


and leadership. They emphasize the importance of praise, feedback and


listening. These are characteristics most often found in close intimate


relationships, which brings us back to relationship building as being a key


concept in motivating people to work hard and be loyal to you and/or the


company as a whole.


Peter F. Drucker, author of The Effective Executive, felt that habit and


practice must be learned in order to be effective. He is one of the early


0th Century theorist who forged his way into motivational research in a


time when white men in gray suits were the norm of the day. His theories are


more clear and focused as opposed to his more modern counterparts in that he


is not as concerned with the hearts and feelings of workers, or at least he


does not articulate as much in his book, but he does care how about getting


the most out of the worker by examining what it is they want for their extra


effort.


At the time of Druckers research, manual workers were the majority. Factory


line workers had only one goal, to produce allotted production. They were


judged according to quantity not quality. Today, due to the vast growth of


corporate institutions, the worker is relied upon for their knowledge and


expertise. Workers come to the plate educated in theory in concepts of their


respective fields. They are ready to contribute their all to the company.


This shift from manual workers to expertise driven employees is where


Druckers theory is born. He believes that going from doing it right,


following instruction and producing according to daily quotas, to getting


the right things done in order to be more effective. It is one thing to


create impressive and intelligent materials, but not conducive if it falls


short of the desired outcome. If effectiveness is lacking in his work, his


commitment to work and to contribution will soon wither, and he will become


a timer-server going through the motionsto 5. (Drucker, (166, 167),


p. 4)


Drucker emphasizes getting the right things done (p. 1) The first of his


theories is that effectiveness can be learned. In order to be effective, one


must adhere to some basic princples of discipline. It is not enough to be


knowledgable and creative. By implementing time management skills through


via discarding any action that wastes time and which could be better


utilized. Another suggestion toward effectiThird, where and how to mobilize


strengths for best effectiveness is contribution. Drucker believes this is


key. What this means is rather than spending valuable time within the


trenches micro-managing, it is wiser to forward think. Kouzes/Posner also


believed in forward thinking as a way to stay ahead of the competition as


well as to keep the company fresh. Setting up right priorities ties


together all the other elements to produce effective decision making.


Knowledge work is not defined by quantity. Neither is knowledge work


defined by its costs. Knowledge work is defined by its results. (Drucker,


(Spring 000), p. 7)


Covey , Drucker, Depsain, Kouzes and Posner all agree various values;


integrity, honesty, humility, and the list goes on. Not all theorists


prioritize their value systems in the same order. In the Leadership


Challenge, the first there are The reason these three lead the list Cause


and Effect With manual labor, such as line-workers in a factory, the need


for self-actualization may not apply. In this case, however, it is still


important to treat the worker with respect. Unfortunately, not all managers


have taken to the human touch.


Credibility is mentioned in most by most of the theorists as being a key


component to building trust. A leader must walk the talk by participating


in the values and ethics laid out to employess.


When you come to work in the morning, youre expected to behave in this


manner. And we will, too. I promise you that. (Despain, (00), p. 155)


Participation by unleashing peoples potential - It is the leaders job to


strike a match, to light the employees potential. To do that requires the


leader to undo any structures and systems that might snuff it out. If she


can, people will be able to work up to their full potential, and amazing


things can happen. (Rosen, (16), p. 114)


James Despain, although not a theorist by trade, wrote his book And Dignity


for All, Unlocking Greatness with Values-Based Leadership, and in this book


he conveyed his journey from worker to working leader. He and his employees


devised a ten step guideline called Our Common Values in order to


communicate, particpate and integrate his employees to come together as a


community in order to achieve common goals. His focus on diminishing ego


driven leadership and making the employees a valued commodity.


As Despain learned along his personal journey, so to has todays human


resources industry. As the corporate climate has changed in the past fifty


years to include women, so to has corporate culture changed to that of a


more nurturing and mentoring environment. Learning by mastering the


mentoring process and liberating the human spirit. We are reflections of


our experience. That experience includes whom we know and how we make use of


those contacts. Networking is a vital part of survival in business. As we


learn from others along the journey, so too is it only fair that we give


back to those who are beginning their own journeys. Liberating the human


spirit, To sustain such growth, people must be willing to grow and renew


themselves at all times. And the organization must always be seeking better


ideas and better results. ( p.188)


A leader creates an ideal direction for the organization to take in order to


achieve the ultimate success. Successful leaders make the whole greater


than the sum of its parts. They take charge of the organization and feel a


sense of obligation and responsibility for making things happen. This can


only occur if the leader has a mental image of the ideal organization he


wants to create. (p.). Robert H. Rosen believes the key elements of


leadership after trust are trust by sharing yourself.


My goals going forward in this program and in life is to make my voice heard


and more than my voice, my message as well. I want to encompass grace,


humility, integrity, pride, love, empathy, honesty and hope. I want to walk


my talk each day and if I can make an impact on one person, I will have been


a successful leader.


References


Kouzes, J.M., & Posner, B.Z. (00).Leadership Challenge(rd ed)


San FranciscoJossey-Bass


Drucker, P. (166, 167).The Effective Executive


New York, Evanston and LondonHarper & Row


Despain, J. (00).And Dignity for All, Unlocking Greatness with Values-Based Leadership


New JerseyPearson Education, Inc.


Drucker, P. (Spring 000).Managing Knowledge Means Managing Oneself Leader to Leader.


8-10Retrieved from http//www.druckerfoundation.com


Covey, S. (11).Three Resolutions Covey Leadership Center and Franklin Covey.


Retrieved from http//www.peoplesuccess.com/covey1.htm


Rosen, R. (16).Leading People


New YorkPenguin Books


Covey, S. (18). The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People; Powerful Lessons in Personal Change


New YorkFireside and colophon are registered trademarks of Simon & Schuster, Inc.


McGregor, D. (160).The Human Side of Enterprise


New YorkMcGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.


Please note that this sample paper on An Analysis of Leadership Theory; Personal Leadership Definition; and Personal Progress as a Leader is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on An Analysis of Leadership Theory; Personal Leadership Definition; and Personal Progress as a Leader, we are here to assist you.Your cheap custom college paper on An Analysis of Leadership Theory; Personal Leadership Definition; and Personal Progress as a Leader will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.


Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!