If you order your research paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on Validating the Ideals of the Communist Manifesto. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality Validating the Ideals of the Communist Manifesto paper right on time.
Our staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Validating the Ideals of the Communist Manifesto, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your Validating the Ideals of the Communist Manifesto paper at affordable prices
Validating the Ideals of
The Communist Manifesto
The use of certain language in history to describe some political structures and political ideas has long been shaped and formed in such ways that tend to reflect those in power and account for their notable accomplishments.The way we understand much of our world's history is through lens that were created by those in charge.For quite some time now it has been evident that some historical stories and accounts do not cover all elements in history at a given time.That is, they are unsuccessful in explaining the interdisciplinary aspects of life in a particular era.One area in which this is a huge problem is in the relationship between the bourgeois and the proletariat.In The Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx's explanation of the position of the proletariat in society is crucial in acquiring a better understanding of history and his literature.Without decent clarity on how history really occurred, we are stuck in a world in which the bourgeois rule our history books, our literature texts, and our political mindsets.
It is important to review some of the major points raised in The Communist Manifesto and show how they do indeed play a part in the way we view history today.While Marx uses many examples that are not particularly cited from any specific real life experiences, they are valuable examples with which we are able to reason philosophically.I will outline some of the most significant arguments for his stance and highlight how these reasons work in relation to the creation of a new society through an ultimate revolution.
Order Custom Essay on Validating the Ideals of the Communist Manifesto
First we have the issue of what can be called the perpetual cycle.Cycles in history are interesting to examine, contemplate, and argue about.However, no matter where one stands on a particular issue, there is no doubt that some cycles of events in history have been perpetuated far too long.Moreover, there is helpful rhetoric out there to assist us in understanding these cycles, how they evolved, and how we can change them for the better.Embodied in many of the political arguments in this paper are philosophical principles that are extremely telling in terms of how certain classes deal with one another in the cycle.It is these philosophical principles I want to touch upon the most.
One cycle Marx observes among the bourgeois and proletariat in history is the continuous sinking of the proletariat as they do their day-to-day work.It seems as if they are caught in an hourglass, continually sinking downwards until they are exhausted and at their lowest and have nothing left to give.
The lower strata of the middle classthe small tradespeople, shopkeepers, and retired tradesmen generally, the handicraftsmen and peasantsall sink gradually into the proletariat, partly because their diminutive capital does not suffice for the scale on which Modern Industry is carried on and is swamped in the competition with the large capitalists, and partly because their specialized skill is rendered worthless by new methods of production (Marx, 165).
This quote exemplifies the apparent nature of worker relations between the bourgeois and the proletariat.Marx explains the difficulty in something so simple as making ends meet, as we might call it today.It is important to realize that this struggle exists in the first place, without completely discounting it for the boring history of a particular era, which almost undoubtedly favors the bourgeois.Given the existence of the proletariat situation, we are now able to look at some of the other ways in which proletariat life was burdened by the dominance of the bourgeois and extreme capitalist mindsets.
Perhaps one of the most frustrating aspects of evaluating the bourgeois and proletariat in a society is the political slant.While Marx's writings can, no doubt, be considered valuable pieces of political philosophy, it becomes more and more evident as one reads along that the political is equated with the mental.That is, the upper classes of citizens are so politically different and opposed to those in the lower class that they simply "don't get it" mentally.The plight of the poor, hard worker is a foreign notion to the fortunate bourgeois member who sits higher in society.He cannot possibly identify with the problems that plague the proletariat, so he politicizes them as an excuse.In other words, in lieu of making an attempt to truly understand another side of the story, especially where exploited workers are concerned, it is much easier and more convenient to politicize the debate in such a way that makes the proletariat look uneducated, unskilled, poor, and worthless, having nothing of use or value to offer.
"Every class struggle is a political struggle" (Marx, 166).It is evident that while the bourgeois may seem important in society, they are not all that different; they simply have an alternate way of viewing things than those in lower classes, although that should not necessitate a superiority complex on their part.This inherently political way of viewing different situations is symbolic of the bourgeois's mundane political mentality and showcases it as a scapegoat for the real issues.
Along the same lines as the misunderstanding of proletariat life on the part of the bourgeois is the issue of a lost appreciation for the proletariat people altogether.The individualism is lost in an extreme capitalist, self-interested society.Factories diminish the individual capabilities of the worker that make that person so unique in the first place.Routine schedules and standardized work assignments hinder the creative nature of individualscreative natures that could actually potentially benefit production and appreciation of personal skills and talents much more than the continually boring repetition of one product after another.The perpetuation of this mentality eventually brings about the ignorant idea that "those people" (the proletariat) are simple-minded, factory level workers whose opinions and presence are not crucial in the world, except of course, for speeding up production and increasing profits for the bourgeois by overworking and exploiting them.This furthers the overall division of classes and drives deeper, wider wedges between each group's comprehension of the other in society.
Moreover, the bourgeois made a point to condense the importance of certain jobs and professions to continue the on-going separation between classes."The bourgeois has stripped of its halo every occupation hitherto honoured and looked up to with reverent awe.It has converted the physician, the lawyer, the priest, the poet, the man of silence, into its paid wage-labourers" (Marx, 161).We can see from this passage specific instances in which Marx outlines the misstep of the bourgeois.It is apparent that the proletariat is not able to excel in the structure created by the bourgeois.It is equally apparent that, unless they do something to counter this cycle, the proletariat has little or no hope of excelling in any way at all.Put very simply, it is difficult to fairly win a baseball game on the opposing team's turf, with the opposing team's personal referee continually (and wrongly) calling fouls against you.
Furthermore, Marx does an excellent job highlighting the differences in the proletariat situation from others with which we might identify today.For example, there are class distinctions in the world that are quite obvious.Many of these are racial, ethnic, religious, and national differences.Some of the main differences are more directly visible than others.However, Marx's point about the proletariat being one in the same, despite race, ethnic background, religion, and national identity, is a valid one.
All previous historical movements were movements of minorities, or in the interest of minorities.The proletarian movement is the self-conscious, independent movement of the immense majority, in the interest of the immense majority (Marx, 168).
This passage demonstrates the validity of the proletariat movement.They are not simply one group of people with a specifically unnatural thing in common.They are also not simply a group of people with the same genes or hair color.They are a group of people, diverse in nature, who live the same kinds of lives, deal with the same kinds of pressures, and work the same kinds of jobs.Additionally, they all have much the same goals.However, they have very little that is "similar" about themselves to bind them together.Rather, they play on experiences each of them has had and work together to attempt to rise above their current situation.I believe there is some legitimacy to a will as powerful as thatone that does not always rely on a statistical number or a group force identity to prove their point.Rather, they can identify with one another in ways that cross racial, ethnic, religious, and national boundaries and find a common ground of their own in which they all work for the betterment of society.
Finally, I would like to examine the notion, structure, and problems of the bourgeois.There is a major issue within the bourgeois that is not immediately obvious from the outside, although it is a moral and political detriment within.
Altogether collisions between the classes of the old society further, in many ways, the course of development of the proletariat.The bourgeois finds itself involved in a constant battle.At first with the aristocracy; later on, with those portions of the bourgeois itself, whose interests have become antagonistic to the progress of industry… (Marx, 167).
The inherent cracking within the bourgeois is actually an outlet for success within the proletariat.As soon as one's opponent begins to crumble, even in the slightest of ways, that is the time to make one's move forward.It is not impossible to attribute some of the successes of the proletariat to the foul play of the bourgeois.Conversely, even Marx makes the opposite argument."The organization of the proletarians into a class, and consequently into a political party, is continually being upset again by the competition between the workers themselves" (Marx, 166).
Despite all we can possibly know about how the bourgeois falls apart on the inside, most people are still relatively convinced that the bourgeois holds a certain place in this history of the world that cannot be challenged by "mere proletarians."The bitterness between societies that feud within is something we are not always able to understand.However, it is abundantly clear from Marx's explanations that the proletarians had many of the odds against them.They continued to sink in ways that were sometimes unavoidable.They were faced with the unchanging mindset of the bourgeois who thought of them as inferior and regarded themselves on the highest level.They dealt with a lost sense of individualism.They dealt with their own skills being diminished down to the lowest paid wage-laboring levels.They banned together and fought the most basic principles of the bourgeois, even though they did not necessarily all share a common genetic, racial, religious or other bond.
It is clear that through their work together, the proletariat is entitled to recognition in relation to their struggle for proper treatment and compensation.Moreover, Marx's depth of understanding of the relationship between the bourgeois and the proletariat is instrumental in helping us, so far removed from that society, understand the nature of the struggles.
Please note that this sample paper on Validating the Ideals of the Communist Manifesto is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on Validating the Ideals of the Communist Manifesto, we are here to assist you.Yourpersuasive essay on Validating the Ideals of the Communist Manifesto will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.
Order your authentic assignment and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!
